The post was in regard to what he, as a submissive man, finds attractive in women. I responded to him personally via his e-mail. He keeps asking why I don't post my comments to his blog.
You want my response? Here goes:
When it comes to what I find physically attractive, because I am a HUMAN, I tend to notice people's eyes first. If I like what I see there (sharp contrast i. e. light eyes/dark skin and vice-versa, intelligence, sparkle, a tendency toward mischief), and if I see fit, I may approach him. What I truly find attractive, though, is his submissiveness, whether he states it outright or I tease it out of him later. I did mention the intelligence, didn't I? Submissive men, in my experience, are more likely to congregate in quiet settings, such as libraries, art galleries, small coffee shops, book shops, and intimate restaurants, rather than run-of-the-mill bars or dance clubs. They tend to move slowly, speak with intelligence and wit, and take great pains to make sure I (or, sometimes, She, if he's with someone) is comfortable. I think Max Headroom may have quipped it best, as one point, back in the mire of the 80s: "I get my kicks above the waistline, Sunshine."
PLEASE COMPREHEND AS BEST YOU CAN. PLEASE WRAP YOUR WEE SUB-MIND AROUND THIS. IF A MAN IS TRULY SUBMISSIVE, THEN HIS SUBMISSION WILL ALWAYS BE WHAT I FIND MOST ATTRACTIVE.
D'oh! Now I'll have to post a comment, just to get this out of my system.
For your entertainment, however, please find attached two (two!) videos for your viewing pleasure--though I wish music video directors would stick with a small portion of reality in regard to truly office-appropriate attire. You're welcome!
NeYo: Miss Independent
. . . because who doesn't love Aretha and Annie?